Confidentiality;
A breach of confidence is where someone on the inside has leaked
confidential information to the press or other sources.
Papers have leaked material in the past; there is the example
of an old case where the jury refused to convict as they had sympathy with the
leaker and believed it was beneficial in the public’s interest.
There is a more recent case that is still circulating the news that breaches confidentiality laws; this being the Edward Snowdon and wiki leaks case. Edward Snowdon, a former employee of the CIA who specialised in computers came to international attention when he disclosed a vast number of classified documents to several media outlets. These documents contained information about operational details of a global surveillance apparatus that was ran by the NSA (National Security Agency).
Qualified privilege; qualified is determined by circumstance
and place.
As long as reports are;
- Fast
- Accurate
- Fair
- Without malice
- In the public’s interest
- No privilege outside of main proceedings
A defence is available when it is considered that the
fact should be freely known in the public’s interest. The public is considered
more important than any potential defamatory risk.
BBC News ‘Credit Suisse ‘aided’ US tax evaders’ there is a risk of their reputation
being damaged as it is a defamatory statement however this headline can be printed because of qualified
privilege.
Another occasion where qualified privilege may arise would
be in an annual general meeting of shareholders where the shareholders may
defame the company but as a journalist we have qualified privilege to report
this.
There has been some tidying up of the law in this area which
has helped journalists as it has regularised some of the areas that were
particularly grey, especially during press conferences of high profile cases
where a statement may have been made that is defamatory, as a journalist we need to known whether or not we can we quote
this statement.
Absolute privilege; absolute is determined by anything covered in court
Anything to do with absolute privilege refers to what we get
when covering cases in court. It must be accurate, fair and competent.
There are different levels of qualified privilege that split
into two; ‘without explanation and contraction’
- Public proceedings in a legislature anywhere in the world
- Public proceedings in a court anywhere in the world
- Public inquiries
- International organisation or conference
Part two privilege;
Subject to explanation and contradiction which are often
found in;
- Public meetings
- Local councils and committees
- Tribunals, commissions, inquiries
- General meetings of UK public companies
- Company documents or extracts
Pressers;
- Pressers are public meetings (Lords 2000)
- Written hand outs are also covered
- Consider risks of live broadcasting; will there be wild accusations? For example alleged misconduct of injustice – allegations about the police may be made which you would not want broadcasted live on television. Even though you are protected under qualified privilege you would not be allowed to make defamatory statements without explanation.
Inquests;
The purpose of an inquest is to establish the cause of death
if it appears ‘violent or unnatural’.
- Conducted by coroners
- Does not rule on who may be responsible
- Inquests provide great material for stories
Inquest juries;
In exceptional cases where the coroner rules that;
- Deceased was in state detention
- Death result of an action by police
- Result of workplace accident
Types of verdict;
- Narrative verdict – increasingly common
- Short form – ‘natural cases’/’misadventure’/’accidental death’/’dependence on drugs’
- Unlawful killing or open verdict
If there is a jury and a verdict of unlawful killing or open
verdict is decided it makes a much more interesting report. As the inquest has
gone ahead and a jury needed to made the final verdict it is clear that the
police have taken a different view however if the jury says that someone was
unlawfully killed it puts the case back to the police.
Media Rules;
·
Inquest is a court proceeding protected by
absolute privilege
·
Covered by contempt of court Act – so no
publishing of prejudicial material
·
Coroners can impose reporting restrictions – if
a child is present or giving a statement.
Ethics and treasure;
- Be aware of bereaved families in your coverage
- Coroners must decide whether found objects of value are ‘treasure’ and subject to reward.
No comments:
Post a Comment